Urgent Open Letter from Doctors and Scientists to the European Medicines Agency regarding COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Concerns

Emer Cooke, Executive Director, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

28 February 2021

Dear Sirs/Mesdames,

FOR THE URGENT PERSONAL ATTENTION OF: EMER COOKE, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE EUROPEAN MEDICINES AGENCY

As physicians and scientists, we are supportive in principle of the use of new medical interventions which are appropriately developed and deployed, having obtained informed consent from the patient. This stance encompasses vaccines in the same way as therapeutics.

We note that a wide range of side effects is being reported following vaccination of previously healthy younger individuals with the gene-based COVID-19 vaccines. Moreover, there have been numerous media reports from around the world of care homes being struck by COVID-19 within days of vaccination of residents. While we recognise that these occurrences might, every one of them, have been unfortunate coincidences, we are concerned that there has been and there continues to be inadequate scrutiny of the possible causes of illness or death under these circumstances, and especially so in the absence of post-mortems examinations.

In particular, we question whether cardinal issues regarding the safety of the vaccines were adequately addressed prior to their approval by the European Medicines Agency (EMA).

As a matter of great urgency, we herewith request that the EMA provide us with responses to the following issues:

1. Following intramuscular injection, it must be expected that the gene-based vaccines will reach the bloodstream and disseminate throughout the body [1]. We request evidence that this possibility was excluded in pre-clinical animal models with all three vaccines prior to their approval for use in humans by the EMA.

2. If such evidence is not available, it must be expected that the vaccines will remain entrapped in the circulation and be taken up by endothelial cells. There is reason to assume that this will happen particularly at sites of slow blood flow, i.e. in small vessels and capillaries [2]. We request evidence that this probability was excluded in pre-clinical animal models with all three vaccines prior to their approval for use in humans by the EMA.

3. If such evidence is not available, it must be expected that during expression of the vaccines’ nucleic acids, peptides derived from the spike protein will be presented via the MHC I — pathway at the luminal surface of the cells. Many healthy individuals have CD8-lymphocytes that recognize such peptides, which may be due to prior COVID infection, but also to cross-reactions with other types of Coronavirus [3; 4] [5]. We must assume that these lymphocytes will mount an attack on the respective cells. We request evidence that this probability was excluded in pre-clinical animal models with all three vaccines prior to their approval for use in humans by the EMA.

4. If such evidence is not available, it must be expected that endothelial damage with subsequent triggering of blood coagulation via platelet activation will ensue at countless sites throughout the body. We request evidence that this probability was excluded in pre-clinical animal models with all three vaccines prior to their approval for use in humans by the EMA.

5. If such evidence is not available, it must be expected that this will lead to a drop in platelet counts, appearance of D-dimers in the blood, and to myriad ischaemic lesions throughout the body including in the brain, spinal cord and heart. Bleeding disorders might occur in the wake of this novel type of DIC-syndrome including, amongst other possibilities, profuse bleedings and haemorrhagic stroke. We request evidence that all these possibilities were excluded in pre-clinical animal models with all three vaccines prior to their approval for use in humans by the EMA.

6. The SARS-CoV-2 spike protein binds to the ACE2 receptor on platelets, which results in their activation [6]. Thrombocytopenia has been reported in severe cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection [7]. Thrombocytopenia has also been reported in vaccinated individuals [8]. We request evidence that the potential danger of platelet activation that would also lead to disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) was excluded with all three vaccines prior to their approval for use in humans by the EMA.

7. The sweeping across the globe of SARS-CoV-2 created a pandemic of illness associated with many deaths. However, by the time of consideration for approval of the vaccines, the health systems of most countries were no longer under imminent threat of being overwhelmed because a growing proportion of the world had already been infected and the worst of the pandemic had already abated. Consequently, we demand conclusive evidence that an actual emergency existed at the time of the EMA granting Conditional Marketing Authorisation to the manufacturers of all three vaccines, to justify their approval for use in humans by the EMA, purportedly because of such an emergency.

Should all such evidence not be available, we demand that approval for use of the gene-based vaccines be withdrawn until all the above issues have been properly addressed by the exercise of due diligence by the EMA.

There are serious concerns, including but not confined to those outlined above, that the approval of the COVID-19 vaccines by the EMA was premature and reckless, and that the administration of the vaccines constituted and still does constitute “human experimentation”, which was and still is in violation of the Nuremberg Code.

In view of the urgency of the situation, we request that you reply to this email within seven days and address all our concerns substantively. Should you choose not to comply with this reasonable request, we will make this letter public.

Continue reading “Urgent Open Letter from Doctors and Scientists to the European Medicines Agency regarding COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Concerns”

Open Letter to the WHO: Immediately Halt All Covid-19 Mass Vaccinations (Geert Vanden Bossche, DMV, PhD)

Geert Vanden Bossche, DMV, PhD, independent virologist and vaccine expert, formerly employed at GAVI and The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

To all authorities, scientists and experts around the world, to whom this concerns: the entre world population.

I am all but an antivaxxer. As a scientist I do not usually appeal to any platform of this kind to make a stand on vaccine-related topics. As a dedicated virologist and vaccine expert I only make an exception when health authorities allow vaccines to be administered in ways that threaten public health, most certainly when scientific evidence is being ignored.

The present extremely critical situation forces me to spread this emergency call. As the unprecedented extent of human intervention in the Covid-19 pandemic is now at risk of resulting in a global catastrophe without equal, this call cannot sound loudly and strongly enough.

Continue reading “Open Letter to the WHO: Immediately Halt All Covid-19 Mass Vaccinations (Geert Vanden Bossche, DMV, PhD)”

As Predicted: Immunity Passports Are No Longer a Fantasy

by Derrick Broze

As the European Union announces they are preparing to implement “vaccine certificates” the largest airline association is also preparing to roll out their version of the controversial Immunity Passports.

On Thursday, the European Union’s 27 political leaders held a 5-hour virtual call to discuss the future of reopening travel across the continent. German Chancellor Angela Merkel told reporters the leaders have “agreed that we need vaccine certificates.” Merkel also sought to quell fears about the use of such certificates, stating, “it will certainly be good to have such a certificate but that will not mean that only those who have such a passport will be able to travel; about that, no political decisions have been made yet.”

The discussion around immunity passports has grown in recent months, with the UK, Denmark, Sweden, Iceland, and Spain all considering some method of verifying whether an individual has been vaccinated or achieved immunity from COVID-19. UK officials have also discussed the potential for the use of a digital verification tool for domestic travel. In the United States, plans for immunity passports are also being developed. On January 21, Joe Biden outlined a 200-page national coronavirus pandemic strategy which included a call for the U.S. government to “assess the feasibility of linking COVID-19 vaccination to International Certificates of Vaccination.” 

The statements by world leaders comes on the heels of a press conference held by the International Air Travel Association, which represents 299 airlines. On Wednesday, Alexandre de Juniac, the IATA’s Director General and CEO, detailed the upcoming release of the organization’s own immunity passport, the IATA Travel Pass. A slideshow presentation discussing the IATA Travel Pass indicates that the organization plans to have their app fully functional by the early summer.

“With respect to health credentials these past weeks have seen more airlines sign-up to trial the IATA Travel Pass. That will help us be ready for the restart.,” De Juniac stated. He went on to say that the IATA Travel pass must be secure, work with existing systems of travel, and respect data privacy. He did not provide specific details of how privacy would be respected. De Juniac also noted that proof of vaccination and COVID-19 test results must be digital because “fraudulent COVID-19 test results are already proving to be an issue.” 

Continue reading “As Predicted: Immunity Passports Are No Longer a Fantasy”

Exploring the Oxford-AstraZeneca Eugenics Links

Even some in the independent media have bought into the hype surrounding the Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID vaccine and its “non-profit” nature. But once you peel back the layers of obfuscation you quickly find not only the profit motive hiding underneath, but the dark specter of eugenics. Whitney Webb of Unlimited Hangout joins us to discuss her recent article, “Developers of Oxford-AstraZeneca Vaccine Tied to UK Eugenics Movement.”

SHOW NOTES AND MP3: https://www.corbettreport.com/?p=40180

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AJuK7JSlKNw

Review of scientific reports of harms caused by face masks, up to February 2021

A review of scientific publications, up to February 2021, about measured and potential harms of face masks imposed on workers, children, and the general population.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349518677_Review_of_scientific_reports_of_harms_caused_by_face_masks_up_to_February_2021

COVID, les statistiques suisses tournent à la farce! Les preuves de la falsification s’accumulent

“Décidément, les équipes de M. Berset ont du mal à respecter les règles basiques de calcul.

À force de cumuler des biais grossiers dans les méthodes de calcul, pour arriver à définir le taux de positivité, les intentions réelles de notre dirigeant en chef deviennent suspectes.

Après le cycle d’amplification qui peut monter à 50 ; l’intégration dans les statistiques locales de la population transfrontalière qui vient se faire soigner en Suisse grâce à des accords parfaitement ignorés par les chiffres publiés, des statistiques hospitalières qui confondent les hospitalisations DUES au Covid avec celles de malades (y compris en fin de vie ou en grand danger) « accessoirement » testés positifs grâce aux fameux cycles honteusement élevés ; l’infection avancée de certains membres de la task force par les gros capitaux de la Planète finance ; voici une détestable découverte faite par le média alémanique nau.ch.

Nous découvrons dans l’article de nau.ch un trucage de plus qui augmente artificiellement le taux de positivité calculé par les l’OFSP chapeauté par M Berset.

Le Conseil fédéral pratique massivement des tests Covid et les finance dans leur totalité. Mais : seuls les résultats positifs sont inclus dans les statistiques et les conséquences sont énormes.

https://lilianeheldkhawam.com/2021/02/21/covid-les-statistiques-suisses-tournent-a-la-farce-les-preuves-de-la-falsification-saccumulent/

https://web.archive.org/web/20210226131517/https://lilianeheldkhawam.com/2021/02/21/covid-les-statistiques-suisses-tournent-a-la-farce-les-preuves-de-la-falsification-saccumulent/

Science in Pandemic Mode: The Strange Case of the Swiss National COVID-19 Science Task Force

“This overview suggests that the Task Force is hardly acting as a scientific advisory committee, conscious of the limits of its mandate, concerned about the complexity of public health issues (where even the best-intentioned measures can prove deleterious), and eager to demonstrate the greatest possible methodological rigor, by being transparent about both the sources it is using and the unknowns that still accompany the current knowledge.

It is also somewhat disturbing that these alleged experts in public health policy seem to give little weight to avoiding inflammatory statements, which end up confusing and frightening the public. For more than a year now, the population has been in a permanent state of anxiety and must face every day both alarmist media coverage and the undeniable weight of far-reaching restrictions, which have a considerable impact on private and professional life.

The profile of the Task Force, with its public interventions, is increasingly resembling that of a pressure group, whose aim seems to be to promote a given strategy, even if it means imposing it through a selective reading of “science”, and which seems to have no intention either of acknowledging its past errors of appreciation or of learning from them.

The Task Force has had more than ten months to show what it is capable of. The time seems to have come for the legislative power – whose silence has been deafening since the beginning of this crisis – and the people to ask themselves whether they wish to see this group of experts continue to exist and work as it has done so far.”

Deutsch: https://www.re-check.ch/wordpress/fr/wissenschaft-pandemie-task-force/

French: https://www.re-check.ch/wordpress/fr/science-pandemique-task-force/

English: https://www.re-check.ch/wordpress/en/science-pandemic-task-force/

Immune evasion means we need a new COVID-19 social contract

Open Access – Published: February 18, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00036-0

The collective benefits of herd immunity have become similar to a mantra in mass vaccination strategies, repeated by governments and researchers. However, the prominence of herd immunity being touted as a solution to the pandemic might be about to change with the emergence of immune evasion, a virological game changer that is as important as the arrival of SARS-CoV-2 variants. Dealing with immune evasion will require a re-evaluation of public health strategies, and the creation of a new, evidence-based social contract.Studies suggest that the emergence and spread of SARS-CoV-2 variants is correlated with the absence of robust immune protection after first exposure to previous (wild-type) viruses, or even to a vaccine.12 This evolution, associated with the emergence of immune escape mutants, has not only been observed with SARS-CoV-2, but also with other viruses.3 Such evolution might be assisted by the waning of the immune response and notably the antibody response. The rapid arrival of SARS-CoV-2 variants such as the variants first identified in South Africa and Brazil suggests a so-called natural immune evasion.2 Also, the dynamics of natural or vaccinal collective immunity in the regions where these variants emerged might have placed substantial pressure on the viral ecosystem, facilitating the emergence of a variant with enhanced transmissibility.

Continue reading “Immune evasion means we need a new COVID-19 social contract”

The 2020 Worldwide Corona Crisis: Destroying Civil Society, Engineered Economic Depression, Global Coup d’État and the “Great Reset”

By Prof Michel Chossudovsky

This E-book consists of a Preface and Nine Chapters. 

We are dealing with an exceedingly complex process. 

In the course of the last twelve months starting in early January 2020, I have analyzed almost on a daily basis the timeline and evolution of the Covid crisis. From the very outset in January 2020, people were led to believe and accept the existence of a rapidly progressing and dangerous epidemic.

I suggest you first read the Highlights (below), the Preface and Introduction before proceeding with chapters II through IX.

Each of the nine chapters provide factual information as well as analysis on the following topics: What Is Covid-19, what is SARS-CoV-2, how Is it identified, how is it estimated? The timeline and historical evolution of the Corona Crisis, the devastating economic and financial impacts, the enrichment of a social minority of billionaires, how the lockdown policies trigger unemployment and mass poverty Worldwide.

The E-book also includes analysis of curative and preventive drugs as well as a review of Big Pharma’s Covid-19 vaccine initiative.

Also analyzed are issues pertaining to the derogation of fundamental human rights, censorship of medical doctors, freedom of expression and the protest movement. The last chapter focusses on the unfolding global debt crisis, the destabilization of national governments, the threats to democracy including “global governance” and the World Economic Forum’s “Great Reset” proposal.  

This E-Book is made available free of charge with a view to reaching out to people Worldwide. Please help us in this endeavor. Kindly forward to family, friends and colleagues, within your respective communities. 

All Global Research articles including the  E-Book can be read in 27 languages by activating the “Translate Website” drop down menu on the top banner of our home page (Desktop version). 

Readers can reach Prof. Michel Chossudovsky at crgeditor@yahoo.com

Continue reading “The 2020 Worldwide Corona Crisis: Destroying Civil Society, Engineered Economic Depression, Global Coup d’État and the “Great Reset””

WHO Information Notice for IVD Users 2020/05

Nucleic acid testing (NAT) technologies that use polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for detection of SARS-CoV-2

20 January 2021 – Medical product alert Geneva
Reading time: 1 min (370 words) Español

Product type: Nucleic acid testing (NAT) technologies that use polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for detection of SARS-CoV-2

Date: 13 January 2021                                                                      

WHO-identifier: 2020/5, version 2

Target audience: laboratory professionals and users of IVDs.

Purpose of this notice: clarify information previously provided by WHO. This notice supersedes WHO Information Notice for In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Device (IVD) Users 2020/05 version 1, issued 14 December 2020.

Description of the problem: WHO requests users to follow the instructions for use (IFU) when interpreting results for specimens tested using PCR methodology.  

Users of IVDs must read and follow the IFU carefully to determine if manual adjustment of the PCR positivity threshold is recommended by the manufacturer.

WHO guidance Diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 states that careful interpretation of weak positive results is needed (1). The cycle threshold (Ct) needed to detect virus is inversely proportional to the patient’s viral load. Where test results do not correspond with the clinical presentation, a new specimen should be taken and retested using the same or different NAT technology.

WHO reminds IVD users that disease prevalence alters the predictive value of test results; as disease prevalence decreases, the risk of false positive increases (2). This means that the probability that a person who has a positive result (SARS-CoV-2 detected) is truly infected with SARS-CoV-2 decreases as prevalence decreases, irrespective of the claimed specificity.

Most PCR assays are indicated as an aid for diagnosis, therefore, health care providers must consider any result in combination with timing of sampling, specimen type, assay specifics, clinical observations, patient history, confirmed status of any contacts, and epidemiological information.

Actions to be taken by IVD users:

  1. Please read carefully the IFU in its entirety.
  2. Contact your local representative if there is any aspect of the IFU that is unclear to you.
  3. Check the IFU for each incoming consignment to detect any changes to the IFU.
  4. Provide the Ct value in the report to the requesting health care provider.

Contact person for further information:

Anita SANDS, Regulation and Prequalification, World Health Organization, e-mail: rapidalert@who.int

References:

1. Diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020, WHO reference number WHO/2019-nCoV/laboratory/2020.6.

2. Altman DG, Bland JM. Diagnostic tests 2: Predictive values. BMJ. 1994 Jul 9;309(6947):102. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6947.102. 

https://www.who.int/news/item/20-01-2021-who-information-notice-for-ivd-users-2020-05

https://web.archive.org/web/20210121124824/https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/diagnostic-testing-for-sars-cov-2

An overview of Covid-19 Vaccine Side Effects and Allergic Reactions worldwide

We got a code violation from Google for “dangerous and derogatory” content, while we only post links from regular news outlets and a few public posts from Facebook. How is this “dangerous and derogatory”?

https://hpv-vaccine-side-effects.com/covid-19-vaccine-side-effects-world-map/

https://web.archive.org/web/20210121112327/https://hpv-vaccine-side-effects.com/covid-19-vaccine-side-effects-world-map/

Mask Harms in Kids: 68% of Parents Report Alarming Psychological and Physical Problems In First-of-its-kind Study

A German study involving over 25,000 children reveals that major negative impacts on the physical, psychological, and behavioral health of children may be far more widespread than reported in the media and by government officials — affecting approximately 68% and contributing to 24 distinct health complaints, according to parent submitted observations. 

A concerning study conducted in Germany has been posted online as a preprint (not yet peer-reviewed) titled, “Corona children studies “Co-Ki”: First results of a Germany-wide registry on mouth and nose covering (mask) in children,” describing the results of 17,854 parent submitted reports on health complaints or impairments experienced as a result of wearing masks by their 25,930 children.

READ MORE:

https://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/mask-harms-kids-68-parents-report-alarming-problems-first-its-kind-study-preprint1

https://web.archive.org/web/20210103135701/https://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/mask-harms-kids-68-parents-report-alarming-problems-first-its-kind-study-preprint1

Sucharit Bhakdi – Full Interview, Planet Lockdown

This sit down interview with Sucharit Bhakdi about the current situation we find ourselves in. He is the most cited microbiologist in German academic history, an authority if there ever was one Shocked by the events of this year, he is speaking out about the scientific fallacies and human rights abuses at work now.

Dr Reiner Fuellmich is.a German American lawyer with experience going after large companies like Deutsche Bank. He is a member of the German Corona Investigative Committee. He discusses the current situation and his efforts to bring justice to the situation.

This interview was done as apart of the full length documentary. We are releasing the full interview for the betterment of public understanding of the situation.

The full film, when released, will be available at https://www.PlanetLockdownFilm.com

Full Biography:

Sucharit Bhakdi was born in Washington, DC, and educated at schools in Switzerland, Egypt, and Thailand. He studied medicine at the University of Bonn in Germany, where he received his MD in 1970. He was a post-doctoral researcher at the Max Planck Institute of Immunobiology and Epigenetics in Freiburg from 1972 to 1976, and at The Protein Laboratory in Copenhagen from 1976 to 1977. He joined the Institute of Medical Microbiology at Giessen University in 1977 and was appointed associate professor in 1982. He was named chair of Medical Microbiology at the University of Mainz in 1990, where he remained until his retirement in 2012. Dr. Bhakdi has published over three hundred articles in the fields of immunology, bacteriology, virology, and parasitology, for which he has received numerous awards and the Order of Merit of Rhineland-Palatinate. Sucharit Bhakdi and his wife, Karina Reiss, live with their three-year-old son, Jonathan Atsadjan, in a small village near the city of Kiel.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DVq_Eufr9fw

The Future of Vaccines

If the Gateses and the Faucis and the representatives of the international medical establishment get their way, life will not return to normal until the entire planet is vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2. What many do not yet understand, however, is that the vaccines that are being developed for SARS-Cov-2 are unlike any vaccines that have ever been used on the human population before. And, as radically different as these vaccines appear, they represent only the very beginning of a complete transformation of vaccine technology that is currently taking place in research labs across the planet. This is a study of The Future of Vaccines.

https://www.corbettreport.com/futurevaccines/

Catherine Austin Fitts – Full Interview, Planet Lockdown

This sit down interview with Catherine covers the spectrum of the current situation we find ourselves in.

It was conducted as apart of the full length documentary. We are releasing the full interview for the betterment of public understanding of the situation.

Catherine’s analysis can be found at:
https://home.solari.com​

The full film, when released, will be available at:
https://www.PlanetLockdownFilm.com

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C1-0XKYAZII

SARS-CoV-2 has not been proven to exist; I can do this forever

by Jon Rappoport, December 18, 2020

First of all, very high praise goes to Christine Massey, for her work in exposing the coronavirus fraud. In a half-sane world, she would have received many awards by now.

Her latest communication reads: “Freedom of Information reveals Public Health Agency of Canada has no record of ‘SARS-COV-2’ isolation performed by anyone, anywhere, ever” [1]

I urge readers to visit Massey’s site and read her new article and follow all the links. Her findings are stunning. She and her team have made about 40 FOI requests to public health agencies in various countries, requesting proof that SARS-CoV-2 has been isolated. You’ll see from the responses that not one agency has records demonstrating isolation.

This means exactly what it seems to mean: the virus has not been proven to exist.

As for the people who keep chanting that the virus has been isolated, I can keep explaining why this is not so. I can do this forever. [2] [3]

Whether it’s a scientist, a gaggle of scientists, a government official, a person waving a study around like a newspaper with a hot headline from an old movie, my response is the same, and I make it knowing that some people will intentionally refuse to understand it:

ONE: SAYING the virus has been isolated is not the same thing as proving it’s been isolated.

TWO: Researchers routinely twist the meaning of the word “isolated” to mean its very opposite.

Isolation is absurdly taken to mean: “We have the virus in a soup in a dish in the lab. It is not separated out (isolated) from the soup. The soup contains various cells—human, monkey—and an array of (toxic) chemicals and drugs. We know the virus is there, because it is infecting and killing some of the cells.”

A reasonably bright junior high school student would immediately realize this is not a description of isolation.

A reasonably bright high school student would point out that there is no proof the virus is infecting and killing cells, because the toxic chemicals and drugs in the soup are sufficient to do the cell-killing. He might also mention the cells in the soup are being starved of nutrients, and this alone could cause their death.

Therefore, there is no evidence that “the virus” is actually in the soup.

Therefore, there is no evidence in this situation for claiming the virus exists at all.

Continue reading “SARS-CoV-2 has not been proven to exist; I can do this forever”

WHO (finally) admits PCR tests create false positives

Warnings concerning high CT value of tests are months too late…so why are they appearing now? The potential explanation is shockingly cynical.

Kit Knightly

The World Health Organization released a guidance memo on December 14th, warning that high cycle thresholds on PCR tests will result in false positives.

While this information is accurate, it has also been available for months, so we must ask: why are they reporting it now? Is it to make it appear the vaccine works?

The “gold standard” Sars-Cov-2 tests are based on polymerase chain reaction (PCR). PCR works by taking nucleotides – tiny fragments of DNA or RNA – and replicating them until they become something large enough to identify. The replication is done in cycles, with each cycle doubling the amount of genetic material. The number of cycles it takes to produce something identifiable is known as the “cycle threshold” or “CT value”. The higher the CT value, the less likely you are to be detecting anything significant.

This new WHO memo states that using a high CT value to test for the presence of Sars-Cov-2 will result in false-positive results.

Continue reading “WHO (finally) admits PCR tests create false positives”

I’m a clinical lab scientist, Covid-19 is fake, WAKE UP AMERICA

by Joe Rizoli,

I’m a clinical lab scientist
 
I have a PhD in virology and immunology. I’m a clinical lab scientist and have
tested 1500 “supposed” positive Covid 19 samples collected here in S.
California. When my lab team and I did the testing through Koch’s postulates
and observation under a SEM (scanning electron microscope), we found NO Covid
in any of the 1500 samples.
 
What we found was that all of the 1500 samples were mostly Influenza A and some
were influenza B, but not a single case of Covid, and we did not use the B.S.
PCR test. We then sent the remainder of the samples to Stanford, Cornell, and a
few of the University of California labs and they found the same results as we
did, NO COVID. They found influenza A and B. All of us then spoke to the CDC
and asked for viable samples of COVID, which CDC said they could not provide as
they did not have any samples. We have now come to the firm conclusion through
all our research and lab work, that the COVID 19 was imaginary and fictitious.
 
The flu was called Covid and most of the 225,000 dead were dead through
co-morbidities such as heart disease, cancer, diabetes, emphysema etc. and they
then got the flu which further weakened their immune system and they died. I
have yet to find a single viable sample of Covid 19 to work with. We at the 7
universities that did the lab tests on these 1500 samples are now suing the CDC
for Covid 19 fraud. the CDC has yet to send us a single viable, isolated and
purifed sample of Covid 19. If they can’t or won’t send us a viable sample, I
say there is no Covid 19, it is fictitious. The four research papers that do
describe the genomic extracts of the Covid 19 virus never were successful in
isolating and purifying the samples. All the four papers written on Covid 19
only describe small bits of RNA which were only 37 to 40 base pairs long which
is NOT A VIRUS. A viral genome is typically 30,000 to 40,000 base pairs.
 
With as bad as Covid is supposed to be all over the place, how come no one in
any lab world wide has ever isolated and purified this virus in its entirety?
That’s because they’ve never really found the virus, all they’ve ever found was
small pieces of RNA which were never identified as the virus anyway.
 
So what we’re dealing with is just another flu strain like every year, COVID 19
does not exist and is fictitious. I believe China and the globalists
orchestrated this COVID hoax (the flu disguised as a novel virus) to bring in
global tyranny and a worldwide police totalitarian surveillance state, and this
plot included massive election fraud to overthrow Trump.

https://joerizoliopinions.onlinegroups.net/groups/joe-rizoliopinions/messages/topic/5TCwkDUfl9Q9h0OpKZKf0E

https://web.archive.org/web/20210104114534/https://joerizoliopinions.onlinegroups.net/groups/joe-rizoliopinions/messages/topic/5TCwkDUfl9Q9h0OpKZKf0E

CRUCIAL Viral Update Dec 7th – Europe and USA Explained!

This a big one – like my epic Sept 8th Crucial Update, which garnered 1,700,000 views. DOWNLOAD THIS VIDEO HERE: https://we.tl/t-y1OPZYWRzZ – you all have full permission to upload it wherever you want. Lockdown analysis papers here:

https://thefatemperor.com/published-papers-and-data-on-lockdown-weak-efficacy-and-lockdown-huge-harms/

https://web.archive.org/web/20201209192114/https://thefatemperor.com/published-papers-and-data-on-lockdown-weak-efficacy-and-lockdown-huge-harms/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3cjgicrA504

GAVI – Vaccine Alliance

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation pledged US$ 750 million to set up Gavi in 1999. The Foundation is a key Gavi partner in vaccine market shaping.

https://www.gavi.org/operating-model/gavis-partnership-model/bill-melinda-gates-foundation

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation pledges $1.6 billion to Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, to protect the next generation with lifesaving vaccines.

https://www.gatesfoundation.org/Media-Center/Press-Releases/2020/06/Bill-and-Melinda-Gates-Foundation-pledges-to-Gavi-the-Vaccine-Alliance

Rockefeller Foundation

Gavi receives US$ 5 million from The Rockefeller Foundation.

June 1st 2020.

https://www.gavi.org/news/media-room/gavi-receives-us-5-million-rockefeller-foundation

Pfizer

Pfizer Partners with Gavi.

https://www.pfizer.com/science/vaccines/global-impact/our-impact-on-innovation

Pfizer Partners With Gavi to Supply Our Vaccine to 50 Countries.

https://www.pfizer.com/sites/default/files/investors/financial_reports/annual_reports/2018/our-culture-our-purpose/our-purpose/supply-prevenar/index.html