There is NO pandemic

Here are the facts:

The PCR Coronavirus Test can have 90% False Positives`

“up to 90 percent of people testing positive carried barely any virus”

http://web.archive.org/web/20200829094039/https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/29/health/coronavirus-testing.html

RT-PCR tests are “are not fit for purpose”

https://off-guardian.org/2020/06/27/covid19-pcr-tests-are-scientifically-meaningless

NO MATTER WHAT SOMEONE DIES OF, IF THEY TEST POSITIVE THEIR DEATH IS MARKED AS A COVID-19 DEATH

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvss/coronavirus/Alert-2-New-ICD-code-introduced-for-COVID-19-deaths.pdf

COVID-19 HAS NEVER BEEN PROVEN TO EXIST

“Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available, …”
https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download, PAGE 39, last paragraph.

CDC: 94% of  people who died had 2.6 preexisting  conditions

“For 6% of the deaths, COVID-19 was the only cause mentioned. For deaths with conditions or causes. in addition to COVID-19, on average. there were 2.6 additional conditions or causes per death”

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid_weekly/index.htm?#Comorbidities

CDC COVID-19 Survival Rates

Age 0-19 – 99.997%
Age 20-49 – 99.980%
Age 50-69 – 99.500%
Age 70+ – 94.600%

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/planning-scenarios.html#table-1

Masks Do Not Work

A Review of Science Relevant to COVID-19 Social Policy

https://www.rcreader.com/commentary/masks-dont-work-covid-a-review-of-science-relevant-to- covid-19-social-policy

SHUT OFF YOUR TV AND RESEARCH TRUTH, YOU ARE BEING LIED TO! YOUR FREEDOM AND YOUR LIFE, AND YOUR FAMILIES LIFE, DEPEND ON YOU RESEARCHING THE ABOVE TRUTH; IF NOT, YOU’VE EARNED YOUR FUTURE. LIVE FREE. TRUTH AND LOVE ARE FREE.

Print flyer at https://www.freedom.social/pdf/There-is-NO-pandemic-flyer-2.pdf

Continue reading “There is NO pandemic”

CDC Fauci PCR Fraud Documentary

PCR Creator explaining how people can misuse PCR to detect anything in anybody.Fauci caught on video acknowledging that he knows PCR above 35 is wrong & everyone will be positive. On the Other hand the CDC using 40 cycles to make everyone tests positive. And they are trying to test everyone to create casedemic. While scientific evidence points to 17-24 cycles is only used for diagnosis

1- Fauci Video (4:00-5:45): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a_Vy6fgaBPE

2- CDC PCR Document: https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download

3- The Highwire with Del Bigtree: https://www.bitchute.com/video/d7NLLMTDXfSA/

4- Spiro Skouras: https://www.bitchute.com/video/d7eF5vDATxBq/

https://odysee.com/@Vendetta:a/PCR-Fraud:8

Revealed: COVID19 is really a CDC Computer-Generated ‘Virus’

Published on November 2, 2020

Written by Makia Freeman

CDC (Center for Disease Control) scientists made some COVID admissions that totally destroy the official COVID narrative in a study published in June 2020 entitled Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 from Patient with Coronavirus Disease, United States.

The interesting thing about this whole scamdemic is that when you dig deep enough, the truth is out there – and it is admitted by official sources – however it does take a lot of persistence to cut through the propagandistic maze of disinfo.

In this article, we’re going to take a look at the significance of what the CDC scientists revealed, namely that for their research involving the allegedly new virus SARS-CoV-2, they only used 37 base pairs from actual sample tissue and filled in the rest (around 30,000 base pairs) with computer generated sequences, i.e. they made it up!

The other of the COVID admissions is equally as stunning: after testing they found that SARS-CoV-2 could not infect human tissue.

Continue reading “Revealed: COVID19 is really a CDC Computer-Generated ‘Virus’”

Only Poisoned Monkey Kidney Cells ‘Grew’ the ‘Virus’

This week, my colleague and friend Sally Fallon Morell brought to my attention an amazing article put out by the CDC.  The link to the article is here,  and it was published in June 2020.  The purpose of the article was for a group of about 20 virologists to describe the state of the science of the isolation, purification and biological characteristics of the new SARS-CoV-2 virus, and to share this information with other scientists for their own research. A thorough and careful reading of this important paper reveals some shocking findings.

First, in the section titled “Whole Genome Sequencing,” we find that rather than having isolated the virus and sequencing the genome from end to end, that the CDC “designed 37 pairs of nested PCRs spanning the genome on the basis of the coronavirus reference sequence (GenBank accession no. NC045512).”

To me, this computer-generation step constitutes scientific fraud.  Here is an equivalency: A group of researchers claim to have found a unicorn because they found a piece of a hoof, a hair from a tail, and a snippet of a horn. They then add that information into a computer and program it to re-create the unicorn, and they then claim this computer re-creation is the real unicorn. Of course, they had never actually seen a unicorn so could not possibly have examined its genetic makeup to compare their samples with the actual unicorn’s hair, hooves and horn.

The researchers claim they decided which is the real genome of SARS-CoV-2 by “consensus,” sort of like a vote.  Again, different computer programs will come up with different versions of the imaginary “unicorn,” so they come together as a group and decide which is the real imaginary unicorn.

Continue reading “Only Poisoned Monkey Kidney Cells ‘Grew’ the ‘Virus’”

US authority: Instead of 161,000 deaths, only 9,600 actually died of Covid-19 in the USA

by Corona Investigative, September 28, 2020

The report was supposed to bring the Corona building down for good. According to a report by the US news platform “Gateway Pundit”, the CDC, the “Centers for Disease Control and Prevention” – the US epidemic control authority – has supplemented the previous method of counting Covid-19 deaths. Now it will be disclosed how many patients actually died from Covid-19. However, this has been done quietly and secretly – the major media have not reported anything about it so far. The CDC has now determined that instead of 161,000, only 9,600 Americans actually died of Covid-19 – only 6% of the number originally mentioned (as of August 26, 2020). All other statistically recorded Covid-19 deaths had been due to various serious illnesses from which they had died, an average of 2.6 illnesses per person.

This is roughly in line with earlier known figures from the Hamburg UKE, where systematic autopsies of corona deaths were performed.

“Every deceased person who was previously tested COVID-positive is listed in the statistics as “COVID-dead/dead”, regardless of whether they died directly as a result of the virus disease itself or “with the virus” (from a potentially different cause of death).” The statistics are based on the following criteria: “The COVID-dead/dead person is not a person who died from the virus. 

“Table 3 shows the types of health conditions and contributing causes mentioned in conjunction with deaths involving coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). For 6% of the deaths, COVID-19 was the only cause mentioned. For deaths with conditions or causes in addition to COVID-19, on average, there were 2.6 additional conditions or causes per death. The number of deaths with each condition or cause is shown for all deaths and by age groups.

Reference:

Weekly Updates by Select Demographic and Geographic Characteristics Link

https://web.archive.org/web/20201029130450/https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid_weekly/index.htm

CDC: 85% of COVID-19 patients report ‘always’ or ‘often’ wearing masks

Recently published data from a study by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) finds that 70.6% of COVID-19-positive patients report “always” wearing a mask, 14.4% report “often” wearing a mask, and 3.9% report “never” wearing a mask (See Table: Reported use of cloth face covering or mask 14 days before illness onset.).

The study compared case patients who tested positive (154) and control patients who tested negative (160).

The study also finds that eating and drinking on-site at bars and restaurants increases the risk of contracting COVID-19, with two times as many COVID-19-positive patients reporting dining at restaurants than COVID-19-negative patients.

Study participants were randomly sampled from 11 academic healthcare systems that are part of the Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in the Critically Ill Network, between July 1 and July 29.

https://www.ormanager.com/briefs/cdc-85-of-covid-19-patients-report-always-or-often-wearing-masks/

https://web.archive.org/web/20201101111854/https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/mm6936a5.htm#T1_down

CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel

Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of known titer (RNA copies/μL) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen.”

https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download

https://web.archive.org/web/20201029124047/https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download

Dr. Andrew Kaufman: They Want To Genetically Modify Us With The COVID-19 Vaccine

In this powerful interview Spiro Skouras is joined with Doctor Andrew Kaufman. Spiro and Dr. Kaufman discuss the expanding curtailment of basic civil liberties being normalized under the false pretext of a global health emergency.

Doctor Kaufman lays his reputation and his career on the line as he blows the whistle, on what he describes as a manufactured crisis to carry out a preplanned agenda to facilitate global governance and population control.

Doctor Kaufman is a well educated medical professional who convincingly illustrates, using the CDC’s own technical data, how the public has been manipulated on the grandest scale.

https://www.activistpost.com/2020/05/dr-andrew-kaufman-they-want-to-genetically-modify-us-with-the-covid-19-vaccine.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qy5FD0XameI

Don’t Believe Everything You Read About Flu Deaths

by Lawrence Solomon 01/24/2014 05:40 EST | Updated 03/26/2014 05:59 EDT

The CDC’s decision to play up flu deaths dates back a decade, when it realized the public wasn’t following its advice on the flu vaccine. During the 2003 flu season “the manufacturers were telling us that they weren’t receiving a lot of orders for vaccine,”Dr. Glen Nowak, associate director for communications at CDC’s National Immunization Program, told National Public Radio.

Flu results in “about 250,000 to 500,000 yearly deaths” worldwide, Wikipedia tells us. “The typical estimate is 36,000 [deaths] a year in the United States,” reports NBC, citing the Centers for Disease Control. “Somewhere between 4,000 and 8,000 Canadians a year die of influenza and its related complications, according to the Public Health Agency of Canada,” the Globe and Mail says, adding that “Those numbers are controversial because they are estimates.”

Flu results in “about 250,000 to 500,000 yearly deaths” worldwide, Wikipedia tells us. “The typical estimate is 36,000 [deaths] a year in the United States,” reports NBC, citing the Centers for Disease Control. “Somewhere between 4,000 and 8,000 Canadians a year die of influenza and its related complications, according to the Public Health Agency of Canada,” the Globe and Mail says, adding that “Those numbers are controversial because they are estimates.”

“Controversial” is an understatement, and not just in Canada, and not just because the numbers are estimates. The numbers differ wildly from the sober tallies recorded on death certificates — by law every certificate must show a cause — and reported by the official agencies that collect and keep vital statistics.

According to the National Vital Statistics System in the U.S., for example, annual flu deaths in 2010 amounted to just 500 per year — fewer than deaths from ulcers (2,977), hernias (1,832) and pregnancy and childbirth (825), and a far cry from the big killers such as heart disease (597,689) and cancers (574,743). The story is similar in Canada, where unlikely killers likewise dwarf Statistics Canada’s count of flu deaths.

Even that 500 figure for the U.S. could be too high, according to analyses in authoritative journals such as the American Journal of Public Health and the British Medical Journal. Only about 15-20 per cent of people who come down with flu-like symptoms have the influenza virus — the other 80-85 per cent actually caught rhinovirus or other germs that are indistinguishable from the true flu without laboratory tests, which are rarely done. In 2001, a year in which death certificates listed 257 Americans as having died of flu, only 18 were positively identified as true flus. The other 239 were simply assumed to be flus and most likely had few true flus among them.

“U.S. data on influenza deaths are a mess,” states a 2005 article in the British Medical Journal entitled “Are U.S. flu death figures more PR than science?” This article takes issue with the 36,000 flu-death figure commonly claimed, and with describing “influenza/pneumonia” as the seventh leading cause of death in the U.S.

“But why are flu and pneumonia bundled together?” the article asks. “Is the relationship so strong or unique to warrant characterizing them as a single cause of death?”

The article’s answer is no. Most pneumonia deaths are unrelated to influenza. For example, “stomach acid suppressing drugs are associated with a higher risk of community-acquired pneumonia, but such drugs and pneumonia are not compiled as a single statistic,” explained Dr. David Rosenthal, director of Harvard University Health Services. “People don’t necessarily die, per se, of the [flu] virus — the viraemia. What they die of is a secondary pneumonia.”

Pneumonia, according to the American Lung Association, has more than 30 different causes, influenza being but one of them. The CDC itself acknowledges the slim relationship, saying “only a small proportion of deaths… only 8.5 per cent of all pneumonia and influenza deaths [are] influenza-related.”

Because death certificates belie claims of numerous flu deaths, CDC enlisted computer models to arrive at its 36,000 flu-death estimate. But even here it needed to bend conventional medical terminology to arrive at compelling death numbers.

“Cause-of-death statistics are based solely on the underlying cause of death [internationally defined] as ‘the disease or injury which initiated the train of events leading directly to death,'” explains the National Center for Health Statistics. Because the flu was rarely an “underlying cause of death,” the CDC created the sound-alike term, “influenza-associated death.”

Using this new, loose definition, CDC’s computer models could tally people who died of a heart ailment or other causes after having the flu. As William Thompson of the CDC’s National Immunization Program admitted, influenza-associated mortality is “a statistical association … I don’t know that we would say that it’s the underlying cause of death.”

The CDC’s decision to play up flu deaths dates back a decade, when it realized the public wasn’t following its advice on the flu vaccine. During the 2003 flu season “the manufacturers were telling us that they weren’t receiving a lot of orders for vaccine,”Dr. Glen Nowak, associate director for communications at CDC’s National Immunization Program, told National Public Radio. “It really did look like we needed to do something to encourage people to get a flu shot.”

The CDC’s response was its “Seven-Step ‘Recipe‘ for Generating Interest in, and Demand for, Flu (or any other) Vaccination,” a slide show Nowak presented at the 2004 National Influenza Vaccine Summit.

Here is the “Recipe that fosters influenza vaccine interest and demand,” in the truncated language that appears on his slides: “Medical experts and public health authorities [should] publicly (e.g. via media) state concern and alarm (and predict dire outcomes) – and urge influenza vaccination.” This recipe, his slide show indicated, would result in “Significant media interest and attention … in terms that motivate behavior (e.g. as ‘very severe,’ ‘more severe than last or past years,’ ‘deadly’).” Other emotive recommendations included fostering “the perception that many people are susceptible to a bad case of influenza” and “Visible/tangible examples of the seriousness of the illness (e.g., pictures of children, families of those affected coming forward) and people getting vaccinated (the first to motivate, the latter to reinforce).”

The CDC unabashedly decided to create a mass market for the flu vaccine by enlisting the media into panicking the public. An obedient and unquestioning media obliged by hyping the numbers, and 10 years later it is obliging still.

https://www.huffingtonpost.ca/lawrence-solomon/death-by-influenza_b_4661442.html

https://web.archive.org/web/20200203194613/https://www.huffingtonpost.ca/lawrence-solomon/death-by-influenza_b_4661442.html

CDC scientists admit that 90% of infectious disease mortality decrease in the United States happened before vaccines were available

“Thus vaccination does not account for the impressive declines in mortality seen in the first half of the century…nearly 90% of the decline in infectious disease mortality among US children occurred before 1940, when few antibiotics or vaccines were available.”

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/research_db/annual-summary-of-vital-statistics-trends-in-the-health-of-americans-during-the-20th-century/

https://web.archive.org/web/20201014081832/https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/45-2000-Pediatrics-Vital-Statistics.pdf