Tribunal de Apelación en Portugal considera que las PCR no son fiables y levanta la cuarentena

“Con referencia a Rita Jaafar en este estudio el tribunal concluye que “si una persona da positivo por PCR, si se usa un umbral de 35 ciclos o más (como se describe en la mayoría de los laboratorios de Europa y EE.UU.), la probabilidad de que esta persona esté infectada es <3% y la probabilidad de que el resultado sea un falso positivo es del 97%”. El tribunal también observa que se desconoce el umbral de ciclo utilizado para las pruebas de PCR que se están llevando a cabo actualmente en Portugal.”

El resumen del tribunal para fallar contra la apelación de la autoridad regional de salud dice lo siguiente:

“Dadas las dudas científicas expresadas por los expertos, es decir, los que intervienen, sobre la fiabilidad de las pruebas de PCR, la falta de información sobre los parámetros analíticos de las pruebas y la falta de un diagnóstico médico sobre la presencia de una infección o una infección Riesgo comprobado, este tribunal nunca puede determinar si C era realmente un portador del virus SARS-CoV-2 o si A, B y D estaban expuestos a un alto riesgo.”

Los efectos del juicio

“Este juicio debe tener implicaciones legales masivas en Portugal. Además, hay un antiguo juicio por el forzar a cada pasajero que aterriza en un aeropuerto del territorio de las Azores a una cuarentena de 14 días, de la Corte Constitucional que ha sido declarado como inconstitucional.

También es de esperar que los tribunales de otros países de la UE puedan utilizar estas sentencias como una oportunidad para abordar las bases científicas que fueron decisivas para ser dictaminadas.”

Continue reading “Tribunal de Apelación en Portugal considera que las PCR no son fiables y levanta la cuarentena”

There is NO pandemic

Here are the facts:

The PCR Coronavirus Test can have 90% False Positives`

“up to 90 percent of people testing positive carried barely any virus”

RT-PCR tests are “are not fit for purpose”



“Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available, …”, PAGE 39, last paragraph.

CDC: 94% of  people who died had 2.6 preexisting  conditions

“For 6% of the deaths, COVID-19 was the only cause mentioned. For deaths with conditions or causes. in addition to COVID-19, on average. there were 2.6 additional conditions or causes per death”

CDC COVID-19 Survival Rates

Age 0-19 – 99.997%
Age 20-49 – 99.980%
Age 50-69 – 99.500%
Age 70+ – 94.600%

Masks Do Not Work

A Review of Science Relevant to COVID-19 Social Policy covid-19-social-policy


Print flyer at

Continue reading “There is NO pandemic”

Reiner Fuellmich interviewed Dr. Mike Yeadon, former vice president for Pfizer about PCR Tests

Dr. Mike Yeadon, a former Vice President and Chief Science Officer for Pfizer for 16 years, says that half or even “almost all” of tests for COVID are false positives. Dr. Yeadon also argues that the threshold for herd immunity may be much lower than previously thought, and may have been reached in many countries already.

German Lawyer Reiner Fuellmich found evidence for the wrong usage and the deliberately intended misinterpretation by the governments of the PCR-tests that all corona restrictions in the world are based on!!! Gigantic lawsuits against the people in charge are following!!!

German Lawyer Sues The World Over Coronavirus

Patrick Bet-David has a virtual sit down with consumer protection trial lawyer Reiner Fuellmich to talk about the Coronavirus and his work on the German Corona investigation committee.

About the guest: Dr Reiner Fuellmich is one of four members of the German Corona Investigative Committee, which since July 10, 2020, has been listening to large number of international scientists’ and experts’ testimonies, to find answers to questions about the pandemic, being asked by people worldwide.

About Patrick Bet-David: CEO, author and Founder of Valuetainment Media. Patrick has interviewed athletes, notorious individuals, politicians, authors and entrepreneurs from all walks of life.

Panic Paper:

CDC Fauci PCR Fraud Documentary

PCR Creator explaining how people can misuse PCR to detect anything in anybody.Fauci caught on video acknowledging that he knows PCR above 35 is wrong & everyone will be positive. On the Other hand the CDC using 40 cycles to make everyone tests positive. And they are trying to test everyone to create casedemic. While scientific evidence points to 17-24 cycles is only used for diagnosis

1- Fauci Video (4:00-5:45):

2- CDC PCR Document:

3- The Highwire with Del Bigtree:

4- Spiro Skouras:

Inquiry to Berlin Senate raises doubts about validity of PCR test

“In response to a question from the Berlin House of Representatives, the Berlin Senate Administration takes a somewhat unclear position on the effectiveness of PCR tests.

The Senate Department of Health has confirmed that PCR tests are not actually capable of detecting an infection within the meaning of the Infection Protection Act. This is clear from the answer to a question by individual Member of Parliament Marcel Luthe.

The Senate Administration stated that in the context of the law, the test must be a “reproductive agent (virus, bacterium, fungus, parasite) or other biological transmissible agent that can cause infection or communicable disease in humans” in order to be considered a “pathogen”.

In response to the congressman’s question whether “a so-called PCR test is capable of distinguishing between a ‘replicable’ and a ‘nonreplicable’ virus,” the Senate Administration answered with a “no”.

In explaining why the Senate nevertheless bases its considerations and measures to protect against infection on PCR test results, the Senate replies: “Because the PCR test detects the presence of SARS-CoV-2 viruses. The presence of these viruses correlates with an infection with these viruses. This infection is relevant for the considerations of infection control”. Therefore, it could also be assessed in which way the SARS-CoV-2 “infections” would have developed.

Luthe is not convinced by these answers. He told the Berliner Zeitung: “It is now urgently time to act rationally and in accordance with the rule of law again. If even the Senate has to admit that the test numbers reported daily do not indicate an infection in the sense of the law, the ordinances also lack the basis. After all, no one can currently say whether and how many infections are actually present. The tests cost immense resources, are a billion-dollar business for the manufacturers, but are useless for fighting infections.”

COVID testing: we’ve been duped

by A. Castellitto

Lost in this whole pandemic hysteria are some key considerations that when carefully analyzed place the whole COVID-19 narrative in a highly questionable light.  The gatekeepers of information dissimulation are manufacturing consent at an alarming rate, but their fatigue is setting in, and their masks are falling off.  What better, albeit unlikely, source to go for some much needed illumination than the New York Times

During a considerably quieter time, back in 2007, the New York Times featured a very interesting exposé on molecular diagnostic testing — specifically, the inadequacy of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test in achieving reliable results.  The most significant concern highlighted in the Times report is how molecular tests, most notably the PCR, are highly sensitive and prone to false positives.  At the center of the controversy was a potential outbreak in a hospital in New Hampshire that proved to be nothing more than “ordinary respiratory diseases like the common cold.”  Unfortunately, the results wrought by the PCR told a different story. 

Thankfully, a faux epidemic was avoided but not before thousands of workers were furloughed and given antibiotics and ultimately a vaccine, and hospital beds (including some in intensive care) were taken out of commission.  Eight months later, what was thought to be an epidemic was deemed a non-malicious hoax.  The culprit?  According to “epidemiologists and infectious disease specialists … too much faith in a quick and highly sensitive molecular test .. led them astray.”  At the time, such tests were “coming into increasing use” as maybe “the only way to get a quick answer in diagnosing diseases like … SARS, and deciding whether an epidemic is under way.”

Continue reading “COVID testing: we’ve been duped”

Swiss Cardiologist Was ARRESTED For Disagreeing With Covid-19 Lockdown & Exposing Flawed PCR Test!

Dr. Thomas Binder is a highly respected cardiologist based in Baden, Switzerland. He has paid a big price for questioning the lockdown measures and publicly criticising the controversial PCR test. Thomas tells Richie that the measures used to tackle the virus, will have far greater consequences for public health than any virus could. He also speculates as to the real agenda behind the unnecessary lockdown. This is a must-listen.

Dr. Mike Yeadon PHD Ex Chief Science Adviser for Pfizer

“I think the PCR test at present is throwing up so many false positives that in fact we’re misdiagnosing the cause of the deaths that are being reported. The number of deaths at the moment is normal for the time of year. So if I’m right and the pandemic is fundamentally over, what’s going on? And I think quite simply it’s not over because SAGE says it’s not!”

Dr Mike Yeadon PHD, Ex Chief Science Adviser for Pfizer
Twitter @ MichaelYeadon3
11:48 AM – Nov 2, 2020

Yet another case of the missing virus; they lied and locked down the world

ANOTHER key architect of the COVID PCR test had no coronavirus; the whole fake COVID house is falling down.

“We know exactly what we’re doing, but we have no virus available.”

by Jon Rappoport, October 13, 2020, to join our email list click here.

I’ve been exposing the fact that the CDC, in July of this year, admitted, in a document, that…

They didn’t have the SARS-CoV-2 virus. It wasn’t “available.”

This means they couldn’t obtain an isolated specimen of the virus. There is only one reason why.

The virus hasn’t been isolated. And THAT means no one has proved it exists.

And now, I’ve discovered ANOTHER key document. This one apparently formed the basis for the first PCR test aimed at detecting the COVID virus all over the world.

READ WHAT THIS STUDY SAYS. These quotes should be engraved in stone above the entrance to a museum dedicated to the history of medical fraud.

“We aimed to develop and deploy robust diagnostic methodology for use in public health laboratory settings without having virus material available.”

TRANSLATION: We want to develop a test to detect the new COVID virus without having the virus.

“Here we present a validated diagnostic workflow for 2019-nCoV, its design relying on close genetic relatedness of 2019-nCoV with SARS coronavirus, making use of synthetic nucleic acid technology.”

TRANSLATION: We HAVE developed a diagnostic test to detect the new COVID virus. We ASSUME this new virus is closely related to an older coronavirus. We ASSUME we know HOW it is related. We ASSUME, because we don’t have the new COVID virus. Therefore, all our assumptions are made out of nothing. Actually, we have no proof there is a new coronavirus.

“The workflow reliably detects 2019-nCoV, and further discriminates 2019-nCoV from SARS-CoV.”

TRANSLATION: Our new test to detect the new virus? We don’t have the new virus. We’ve never observed it. We can’t study it directly. There is no proof it exists. But we will use the test to detect it.

Continue reading “Yet another case of the missing virus; they lied and locked down the world”

COVID-19: Do We Have a Coronavirus Pandemic, or a PCR Test Pandemic?

Will the huge rollout of COVID tests help end the pandemic—or assure that it will never end?

We have had pseudo-epidemics before. In 2006, much of Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center was shut down, and 1,000 employees were furloughed or quarantined, because whooping cough was thought to be spreading like wildfire based on 142 positive PCR tests.

The employees also had cultures taken, and a couple weeks later not a single one had a positive culture for the slow-growing bacteria, Bordetella pertussis. There had simply been an outbreak of some other ordinary respiratory disease, not the dreaded whooping cough. Gina Kolata wrote in The New York Times: “Faith in Quick Test Leads to Epidemic That Wasn’t.”

It is not so easy to culture a virus, and cultures of SARS-CoV-2 are not routinely done. Unlike in previous epidemics (SARS-CoV-1, H1N1 influenza, Ebola, or Zika), World Health Organization (WHO) guidance has no requirement or recommendation for a confirmatory test in COVID-19.

There is surprisingly little information on the false positive rate of PCR tests for COVID. That all lab tests have false positives should not be controversial, but this idea “has been entirely rejected by governments and the medical establishment, writes Mike Hearn.

Continue reading “COVID-19: Do We Have a Coronavirus Pandemic, or a PCR Test Pandemic?”

Crimes against humanity

Dr. Fuellmich of Germany discusses the findings of the International Corona Investigative Committee that was formed on July 10, 2020 by four lawyers.  The committee is made up of lawyers, doctors, and scientists who together have reached the conclusion that COVID may well be the greatest crime against Humanity in history.

They originally set out to determine:

  • How dangerous is the virus, really?
  • What is the significance of a positive test?
  • What collateral damage has been caused by the corona measures in regards to the world’s health and economy?

Continue reading “Crimes against humanity”

COVID-19 testing in Australia – information for health professionals

Tests for COVID-19 aim to detect the causative virus, SARS-CoV-2, or an immune response to SARS-CoV-2.

The reliability of COVID-19 tests is uncertain due to the limited evidence base. Available evidence mainly comes from symptomatic patients, and their clinical role in detecting asymptomatic carriers is unclear.

The indications for conducting a COVID-19 test have changed through the course of the pandemic. See the current suspect case definition (link is external) and the testing criteria (link is external) on the Department of Health website.

The three main types of SARS-CoV-2 tests are:

  • Nucleic acid detection tests – to detect SARS-CoV-2 viral (Ribonucleic acid) RNA;
  • Rapid antigen tests – to detect antigen viral proteins from the SARS-CoV-2 virus; and
  • Serology tests – to detect IgM and/or IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2.

Continue reading “COVID-19 testing in Australia – information for health professionals”

Dr. Luis de Benito destroys COVID-19 live on Spanish TV!

This front-line, clearly expert Spanish doctor reveals the reality around the truly massive media madness going on at the moment. He explains the actual reality, and the interviewer is thrown into confusion…!

Then a studio journalist is brought in to sort him out – but our doc is solid as a rock – and leaves the henchman for dead! UNREAL. (subtitled).

The science fraud by Prof. Christian Drosten

translated by Corona Investigative, August 03, 2020

Prof. Christian Drosten is known today in principle to everyone who has ever heard of Corona, and that should be most of them. Strangely enough, few know about his strange predictions, his contradictions, his dangerous statements, like scaremongering, (1) but worst of all is probably the obvious science fraud Drosten has committed. The question one asks oneself is, does Prof. Drosten do this out of praiseworthy thoughts, in order to regain renown from his massive mistakes (swine flu scandal), or for monetary reasons, (2) or are there even worse reasons that I dare not address. 

I will show in this article that Drosten has lost the scientific codex or does not know it at all. Either would be fatal. Let’s get on with it.

Photo collage by Corona Investigative

The chronological sequence of the PCR test by Prof. Drosten and the Berlin Charité (pay attention to the chronological dates)

On 30.12.2019: the ophthalmologist Li Wenliang informed professional colleagues by whatsapp that there are 7 cases in his hospital that are confirmed positive for SARS. 

On 31.12.2019: the government in Beijing sent an “intervention force” of virologists and epidemiologists to support the cause in Wuhan.

On 01.01.2020: Prof. Christian Drosten from the Charité heard about it and immediately started the development of SARS viruses before it was even clear and could be clear whether the report from China about SARS was true and proven, and above all before the Chinese virologists published their results! He testified that as of January 1, 2020, he had developed a genetic detection method (3) to reliably prove the presence of the new corona virus in humans.

On 21.01.2020 (3 days before the first publication of the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention [CCDC]) the WHO recommended (4) all nations to use the “safe” test procedure developed by Prof. Drosten. 

Fact: Prof. Drosten used scientifically NOT verified data for his rapidly globalized PRC test of the 2019-nCOV, which was renamed SARS-CoV-2 on February 7, 2020 with the participation of Prof. Drosten. This gave the impression that the Chinese had actually discovered a new virus, but this was never the case! (5)

Continue reading “The science fraud by Prof. Christian Drosten”