Here are the facts:
The PCR Coronavirus Test can have 90% False Positives`
“up to 90 percent of people testing positive carried barely any virus”
RT-PCR tests are “are not fit for purpose”
NO MATTER WHAT SOMEONE DIES OF, IF THEY TEST POSITIVE THEIR DEATH IS MARKED AS A COVID-19 DEATH
COVID-19 HAS NEVER BEEN PROVEN TO EXIST
“Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available, …”
https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download, PAGE 39, last paragraph.
CDC: 94% of people who died had 2.6 preexisting conditions
“For 6% of the deaths, COVID-19 was the only cause mentioned. For deaths with conditions or causes. in addition to COVID-19, on average. there were 2.6 additional conditions or causes per death”
CDC COVID-19 Survival Rates
Age 0-19 – 99.997%
Age 20-49 – 99.980%
Age 50-69 – 99.500%
Age 70+ – 94.600%
Masks Do Not Work
A Review of Science Relevant to COVID-19 Social Policy
SHUT OFF YOUR TV AND RESEARCH TRUTH, YOU ARE BEING LIED TO! YOUR FREEDOM AND YOUR LIFE, AND YOUR FAMILIES LIFE, DEPEND ON YOU RESEARCHING THE ABOVE TRUTH; IF NOT, YOU’VE EARNED YOUR FUTURE. LIVE FREE. TRUTH AND LOVE ARE FREE.
Print flyer at https://www.freedom.social/pdf/There-is-NO-pandemic-flyer-2.pdf
Continue reading “There is NO pandemic”
RT-PCR is the main method for declaring that someone is COVID-19 infected or not, as well as having numerous other uses in molecular biology research and biological testing. Professor Stephen Bustin is a world expert on the technology, and the potential problems with using it to produce accurate and repeatable results. Although the coronavirus test is presented as a binary test, it is actually based on whether the production of DNA is detectable prior to an arbitrary number of PCR cycles. If there is variability in the quantification, then samples will be above or below the limit, when they should not be, resulting in false positives and negatives. David and Stephen walk through the steps, from the extraction of RNA from the original sample, the conversion of the RNA to complementary DNA, and duplication of DNA using PCR, and the optional step of sequencing. While this is dense technical information at times, it is presented logically, and the limitations of this method cannot be understood without taking the cover off the black box. We suggest not listening to this episode when you are trying to do anything else, but sit down in a quiet place so that you can concentrate fully.
Stephen Bustin’s detailed 2017 paper is here:
More information about his work is here:
Background: The ongoing outbreak of the recently emerged novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) poses a challenge for public health laboratories as virus isolates are unavailable while there is growing evidence that the outbreak is more widespread than initially thought, and international spread through travellers does already occur.
Aim: We aimed to develop and deploy robust diagnostic methodology for use in public health laboratory settings without having virus material available.
Methods: Here we present a validated diagnostic workflow for 2019-nCoV, its design relying on close genetic relatedness of 2019-nCoV with SARS coronavirus, making use of synthetic nucleic acid technology.
Results: The workflow reliably detects 2019-nCoV, and further discriminates 2019-nCoV from SARS-CoV. Through coordination between academic and public laboratories, we confirmed assay exclusivity based on 297 original clinical specimens containing a full spectrum of human respiratory viruses. Control material is made available through European Virus Archive – Global (EVAg), a European Union infrastructure project.
Conclusion: The present study demonstrates the enormous response capacity achieved through coordination of academic and public laboratories in national and European research networks.
Keywords: 2019-nCoV; RT-PCR; Wuhan; diagnostics; laboratory; novel coronavirus; outbreak; testing.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest: None declared.