30 facts you NEED to know: Your Covid Cribsheet

You asked for it, so we made it. A collection of all the arguments you’ll ever need.

Kit Knightly

We get a lot of e-mails and private messages along these lines “do you have a source for X?” or “can you point me to mask studies?” or “I know I saw a graph for mortality, but I can’t find it anymore”. And we understand, it’s been a long 18 months, and there are so many statistics and numbers to try and keep straight in your head.

So, to deal with all these requests, we decided to make a bullet-pointed and sourced list for all the key points. A one-stop-shop.

Here are key facts and sources about the alleged “pandemic”, that will help you get a grasp on what has happened to the world since January 2020, and help you enlighten any of your friends who might be still trapped in the New Normal fog (click links to skip):

Continue reading “30 facts you NEED to know: Your Covid Cribsheet”

Johns Hopkins – Technologies to address

Self-spreading vaccines—also known as transmissible or self-propagating vaccines—are genetically engineered to move through populations in the same way as communicable diseases, but rather than causing disease, they confer protection. The vision is that a small number of individuals in the target population could be vaccinated, and the vaccine strain would then circulate in the population much like a pathogenic virus. These vaccines could dramatically increase vaccine coverage in human or animal populations without requiring each individual to be inoculated. This technology is currently aimed primarily at animal populations. Because most infectious diseases are zoonotic,40 controlling disease in animal populations would also reduce the risk to humans.”

Click to access 181009-gcbr-tech-report.pdf

An overview of Covid-19 Vaccine Side Effects and Allergic Reactions worldwide

We got a code violation from Google for “dangerous and derogatory” content, while we only post links from regular news outlets and a few public posts from Facebook. How is this “dangerous and derogatory”?

https://hpv-vaccine-side-effects.com/covid-19-vaccine-side-effects-world-map/

https://web.archive.org/web/20210121112327/https://hpv-vaccine-side-effects.com/covid-19-vaccine-side-effects-world-map/

The Future of Vaccines

If the Gateses and the Faucis and the representatives of the international medical establishment get their way, life will not return to normal until the entire planet is vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2. What many do not yet understand, however, is that the vaccines that are being developed for SARS-Cov-2 are unlike any vaccines that have ever been used on the human population before. And, as radically different as these vaccines appear, they represent only the very beginning of a complete transformation of vaccine technology that is currently taking place in research labs across the planet. This is a study of The Future of Vaccines.

https://www.corbettreport.com/futurevaccines/

Moderna, vaccines, transfection method, luciferase, mRNA, quantum dots, DNA

Moderna Tx COVID Vaccine

Moderna’s Work on a COVID-19 Vaccine Candidate

COVID Vaccine: mRNA-1273

Moderna’s standard Informed Consent Form and Authorization To Use and Disclose Protected Health Information for Protocol # mRNA-1273-P301

https://www.modernatx.com/modernas-work-potential-vaccine-against-covid-19

SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccine Development Enabled by Prototype Pathogen Preparedness

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7301911/

Transfection Method: Luciferase Spiked Protein

Pseudotyped Luciferase rSARS-CoV-2 Spike for pseudovirus Luciferase Assay (PVLA)

https://www.creative-diagnostics.com/pseudotyped-luciferase-rsars-cov-2-spike-277995-335.htm

Production of Pseudotyped Particles to Study Highly Pathogenic Coronaviruses in a Biosafety Level 2 Setting

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6677141/

mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine

mRNA-1273 is an mRNA vaccine candidate against the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 encoding for a Prefusion stabilized form of the Spike Protein (Luciferase), which was selected by Moderna in collaboration with investigators at the NIAID Vaccine Research Center.

https://www.precisionvaccinations.com/vaccines/mrna-1273-sars-cov-2-vaccine

LIPS method for the detection of SARS‐CoV‐2 antibodies to spike and nucleocapsid proteins

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eji.202048715

mRna-1273 Vaccine & Quantum Dots

Nanotechnology for COVID-19: Therapeutics and Vaccine Research

https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsnano.0c04006

Quantum Dots as Strain- and Metabolism-Specific Microbiological Labels

https://aem.asm.org/content/69/7/4205.short

Design of Quantum Dot-Conjugated Lipids for Long-Term, High-Speed Tracking Experiments on Cell Surfaces

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2642651/

One Step Preparation of Quantum Dot-embedded Lipid Nanovesicles by a Microfluidic Device

https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/getauthorversionpdf/C5RA18862H

Modified RNA has a direct effect on DNA

https://phys.org/news/2020-01-rna-effect-dna.html

Backup including external links:

https://web.archive.org/web/20201127122125/https://chiricaspi.wordpress.com/2020/11/27/moderna-vaccines-transfection-method-luciferase-mrna-quantum-dots-dna/

Pfizer’s Experimental COVID-19 Vaccine – What You’re Not Being Told

Pfizer’s long history of scandals, and the fact that they have never been held to account for their crimes, continues to be ignored by the media, even as its experimental mRNA vaccine candidate for Covid-19 draws ever closer to US government approval.

by Johnny Vedmore November 18, 2020

The vaccine information war has kicked up a gear, and the mainstream media vultures are circling to descend on any content that they can easily label and dismiss as misinformation. Laws will be passed throughout legislatures globally to criminalise anyone who publicly misunderstands any part of the complex biological processes involved in many of the new experimental vaccine technologies that are being used to produce Covid-19 vaccine candidates.

Even now, intelligence agencies and intelligence-backed tech companies are set to deploy sophisticated methods to censor content and deplatform news websites that they view as promoting ‘vaccine hesitancy’ as well as ‘vaccine misinformation’, particularly as a Covid-19 vaccine candidate lurches closer to approval.

It is expected that by month’s end the mRNA vaccine produced by the scandal-ridden pharmaceutical giant Pfizer will be approved by the US government via an emergency-use authorization, with other countries expected to follow suit. Pfizer, in anticipation of the seemingly imminent and assured approval of their vaccine candidate, has already been manufacturing hundreds of millions of doses of its vaccine for weeks and has received praise from governments and mainstream media alike for its self-reported claims that its vaccine is 90 percent effective.

In particular, the success of the experimental mRNA mass vaccination program appears to hinge on the general population being unable to effectively articulate their concerns and objections. Whilst the mainstream media are quick to point out when somebody makes an error in how they believe the mRNA vaccine works, they don’t offer any further information than the official government line. Public distrust in vaccination programs is not the fault of those who don’t understand the way this brand-new technology works. Public distrust is all-pervasive because only one side of the argument is allowed to be heard. We do need to understand the technology involved, as there is a difference between mRNA vaccines and DNA vaccines. Having a general understanding of the reason why someone should object to being given an experimental mRNA vaccine is necessary for creating a clear and coherent argument.

We are about to examine a subject that has been one of the most censored topics in the modern era. But now, more than ever before, we are in desperate need of the information that is being systematically hidden from the public. This article will be banned and attacked by those who believe we, the general public, shouldn’t know all the information about what they want to achieve from the coming mass global vaccinations. The reason for the current establishment’s unwillingness to speak about this subject leads to perhaps unnecessary suspicion. Such suspicions will never be dismissed via the currently employed tactic of smearing anyone who questions intentions. If governments worldwide want their populations to submit to these vaccinations, then they need to stop patronising people and speak honestly. However, since that is unheard of, they will continue to employ coercive tactics, as they will be trying out a never-before-approved experimental method to boost the immune system by manipulating the process our DNA uses to signal for the creation of certain proteins, and we have little idea of what the long-term impact this brand-new therapeutic technology could have on our health. No politician, medical expert, or pharmaceutical representative is willing to accept responsibility for challenges that might be around the corner.

Continue reading “Pfizer’s Experimental COVID-19 Vaccine – What You’re Not Being Told”

Virus on trial

translated by Corona Investigative November 16, 2020

Author Dr. Stefan Lanka – March 11, 2015

Why there are no disease-causing viruses. Why people believe in them and vaccinate. The actual causes of the diseases. How a process can provide clarity.

On 03/12/2015, the continuation in the measles virus trial will take place at the Regional Court of Ravensburg from 9.00 am. Dr. Lanka published a competition in November 2011 and offered € 100,000 to anyone who submits a scientific publication proving the existence of the measles virus. The publication must come from the Robert Koch Institute (RKI), must meet the requirements of the German Infection Protection Act (IfSG) and must specify the diameter of the virus. 

The background to the competition is that the federally owned Robert Koch Institute (RKI) has obtained findings that refute public claims about the existence of disease-causing viruses and the justification for vaccination, especially measles vaccination. The aim of the competition is to remedy these shortcomings. A young doctor submitted 6 publications which did not meet the criteria of the IfSG, which did not come from the RKI, went to court, triggered a nationwide press campaign to claim the prize money by circumventing the regulations.

The Court appointed an expert to check whether any of the 6 publications contained scientific evidence of the existence of the measles virus and whether the diameter was determined. The expert opinion concludes that none of the 6 publications contains proof of the existence of the measles virus and that the publications are deficient. However, a combination of statements from the 6 publications together would provide proof of the existence of the measles virus. 

In Dr. Lanka’s statement on the expert opinion, which we publish after the trial, Dr. Lanka refers to each of the 6 publications. In a comprehensible manner he shows that none of the 6 publications meets the clearly defined scientific requirements to be allowed to pass them off as scientific. The results and statements of the authors refute the existence claims of a measles virus. The 6 publications prove that the authors misinterpreted typical characteristics of cells as viruses.

Continue reading “Virus on trial”

US biotech firm Inovio reports encouraging virus vaccine results

“Inovio’s vaccine, called INO-4800, is designed to inject DNA into a person so as to set off a specific immune system response against the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

The medication is injected under the skin with a needle, then activated with a device that resembles a toothbrush, which delivers an electrical impulse for a fraction of a second, allowing the DNA to penetrate the body’s cells and carry out its mission.

https://www.timesofisrael.com/us-biotech-firm-inovio-reports-encouraging-virus-vaccine-results/

https://web.archive.org/web/20200630185823/https://www.timesofisrael.com/us-biotech-firm-inovio-reports-encouraging-virus-vaccine-results/

Vaccine Research 2019

This is all of the research I have collected on vaccinations. ALL OF THESE STUDIES ARE PUBLISHED, LEGITIMATE STUDIES ON PUBMED which is a government database.

Vaccines and Autism

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3878266/ 
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21623535 
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25377033 
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24995277 
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12145534 
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21058170 
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22099159 
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3364648/ 
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17454560 
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19106436 
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3774468/ 
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3697751/ 
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21299355 
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21907498 
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11339848 
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17674242 
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21993250 
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15780490 
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12933322 
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16870260
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19043938
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12142947
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24675092

Continue reading “Vaccine Research 2019”

Don’t Believe Everything You Read About Flu Deaths

by Lawrence Solomon 01/24/2014 05:40 EST | Updated 03/26/2014 05:59 EDT

The CDC’s decision to play up flu deaths dates back a decade, when it realized the public wasn’t following its advice on the flu vaccine. During the 2003 flu season “the manufacturers were telling us that they weren’t receiving a lot of orders for vaccine,”Dr. Glen Nowak, associate director for communications at CDC’s National Immunization Program, told National Public Radio.

Flu results in “about 250,000 to 500,000 yearly deaths” worldwide, Wikipedia tells us. “The typical estimate is 36,000 [deaths] a year in the United States,” reports NBC, citing the Centers for Disease Control. “Somewhere between 4,000 and 8,000 Canadians a year die of influenza and its related complications, according to the Public Health Agency of Canada,” the Globe and Mail says, adding that “Those numbers are controversial because they are estimates.”

Flu results in “about 250,000 to 500,000 yearly deaths” worldwide, Wikipedia tells us. “The typical estimate is 36,000 [deaths] a year in the United States,” reports NBC, citing the Centers for Disease Control. “Somewhere between 4,000 and 8,000 Canadians a year die of influenza and its related complications, according to the Public Health Agency of Canada,” the Globe and Mail says, adding that “Those numbers are controversial because they are estimates.”

“Controversial” is an understatement, and not just in Canada, and not just because the numbers are estimates. The numbers differ wildly from the sober tallies recorded on death certificates — by law every certificate must show a cause — and reported by the official agencies that collect and keep vital statistics.

According to the National Vital Statistics System in the U.S., for example, annual flu deaths in 2010 amounted to just 500 per year — fewer than deaths from ulcers (2,977), hernias (1,832) and pregnancy and childbirth (825), and a far cry from the big killers such as heart disease (597,689) and cancers (574,743). The story is similar in Canada, where unlikely killers likewise dwarf Statistics Canada’s count of flu deaths.

Even that 500 figure for the U.S. could be too high, according to analyses in authoritative journals such as the American Journal of Public Health and the British Medical Journal. Only about 15-20 per cent of people who come down with flu-like symptoms have the influenza virus — the other 80-85 per cent actually caught rhinovirus or other germs that are indistinguishable from the true flu without laboratory tests, which are rarely done. In 2001, a year in which death certificates listed 257 Americans as having died of flu, only 18 were positively identified as true flus. The other 239 were simply assumed to be flus and most likely had few true flus among them.

“U.S. data on influenza deaths are a mess,” states a 2005 article in the British Medical Journal entitled “Are U.S. flu death figures more PR than science?” This article takes issue with the 36,000 flu-death figure commonly claimed, and with describing “influenza/pneumonia” as the seventh leading cause of death in the U.S.

“But why are flu and pneumonia bundled together?” the article asks. “Is the relationship so strong or unique to warrant characterizing them as a single cause of death?”

The article’s answer is no. Most pneumonia deaths are unrelated to influenza. For example, “stomach acid suppressing drugs are associated with a higher risk of community-acquired pneumonia, but such drugs and pneumonia are not compiled as a single statistic,” explained Dr. David Rosenthal, director of Harvard University Health Services. “People don’t necessarily die, per se, of the [flu] virus — the viraemia. What they die of is a secondary pneumonia.”

Pneumonia, according to the American Lung Association, has more than 30 different causes, influenza being but one of them. The CDC itself acknowledges the slim relationship, saying “only a small proportion of deaths… only 8.5 per cent of all pneumonia and influenza deaths [are] influenza-related.”

Because death certificates belie claims of numerous flu deaths, CDC enlisted computer models to arrive at its 36,000 flu-death estimate. But even here it needed to bend conventional medical terminology to arrive at compelling death numbers.

“Cause-of-death statistics are based solely on the underlying cause of death [internationally defined] as ‘the disease or injury which initiated the train of events leading directly to death,'” explains the National Center for Health Statistics. Because the flu was rarely an “underlying cause of death,” the CDC created the sound-alike term, “influenza-associated death.”

Using this new, loose definition, CDC’s computer models could tally people who died of a heart ailment or other causes after having the flu. As William Thompson of the CDC’s National Immunization Program admitted, influenza-associated mortality is “a statistical association … I don’t know that we would say that it’s the underlying cause of death.”

The CDC’s decision to play up flu deaths dates back a decade, when it realized the public wasn’t following its advice on the flu vaccine. During the 2003 flu season “the manufacturers were telling us that they weren’t receiving a lot of orders for vaccine,”Dr. Glen Nowak, associate director for communications at CDC’s National Immunization Program, told National Public Radio. “It really did look like we needed to do something to encourage people to get a flu shot.”

The CDC’s response was its “Seven-Step ‘Recipe‘ for Generating Interest in, and Demand for, Flu (or any other) Vaccination,” a slide show Nowak presented at the 2004 National Influenza Vaccine Summit.

Here is the “Recipe that fosters influenza vaccine interest and demand,” in the truncated language that appears on his slides: “Medical experts and public health authorities [should] publicly (e.g. via media) state concern and alarm (and predict dire outcomes) – and urge influenza vaccination.” This recipe, his slide show indicated, would result in “Significant media interest and attention … in terms that motivate behavior (e.g. as ‘very severe,’ ‘more severe than last or past years,’ ‘deadly’).” Other emotive recommendations included fostering “the perception that many people are susceptible to a bad case of influenza” and “Visible/tangible examples of the seriousness of the illness (e.g., pictures of children, families of those affected coming forward) and people getting vaccinated (the first to motivate, the latter to reinforce).”

The CDC unabashedly decided to create a mass market for the flu vaccine by enlisting the media into panicking the public. An obedient and unquestioning media obliged by hyping the numbers, and 10 years later it is obliging still.

https://www.huffingtonpost.ca/lawrence-solomon/death-by-influenza_b_4661442.html

https://web.archive.org/web/20200203194613/https://www.huffingtonpost.ca/lawrence-solomon/death-by-influenza_b_4661442.html

CDC scientists admit that 90% of infectious disease mortality decrease in the United States happened before vaccines were available

“Thus vaccination does not account for the impressive declines in mortality seen in the first half of the century…nearly 90% of the decline in infectious disease mortality among US children occurred before 1940, when few antibiotics or vaccines were available.”

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/research_db/annual-summary-of-vital-statistics-trends-in-the-health-of-americans-during-the-20th-century/

https://web.archive.org/web/20201014081832/https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/45-2000-Pediatrics-Vital-Statistics.pdf